|
There
are several aspects of our debate I would like to refer to. The first
one is relocation. Relocation is and will be one of the key elements of
the European solution to the crisis. In this aspect we need solidarity, I
have no doubt. But we would make a mistake if it became the main tool
of our policy, because it would be a simple incentive for further, even
greater migration flows. This would be something like an encouragement
for possible new migrants and this is why we have to be very cautious,
especially when it comes to the communication with the outside world.
In
the debate, Presidents Kamall and Verhofstadt refer to statistics on
irregular migration in the context of the old new route, i.e. the
Mediterranean route. I am always very cautious when it comes to
statistics, but today I am considering them. First, as for the Balkan
route, it is true that 150 000 irregular migrants have arrived to Europe
since the beginning of this year. But the numbers are falling month
after month.
From
close to 70 000 in January to 50 000 in February to 30 000 in March and
about 1000 so far in April. Just imagine if only in the month of
January, in the middle of winter there were 70 000 migrants, how many
would have come in April if we had not taken action?
Second,
it is also true that since the start of this year, 20 000 irregular
migrants have come to Europe via the Central Mediterranean route; and
the numbers are growing. But no Syrians are among them. They are
nationals of African countries such as Nigeria, Somalia, Gambia, the
Republic of Guinea and Ivory Coast. What would have happened if we had
not closed the Western Balkan route? We already now have three to five
times more African migrants coming through the Central Mediterranean
than this time last year.
Many
have said today our priority should be to set up the European border
and coast guard. I am for it, even if this body will not be operational
in time for this year, as this is not possible. But we must ask
ourselves the question: what is it the European border and coast guard
should do? Let everyone through who wants to enter Europe, or stop and
control them? I think it is obvious and not only for me: they should
stop and control, which means in fact the same very controversial action
that we apply right now. In the first place, we must expect that
national coast guards enforce our law on the European border. The
European border and coast guard should support whose who need help, but
it cannot replace them.
|
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια :
Δημοσίευση σχολίου