Vasilis Giavris *
Agora Dialogue
Agora Dialogue
Imanuelle Kant, one of the most influential thinkers of the Enlightenment Project, defined the Enlightenment as “man’s release from his self-incurred tutelage” which Kant defined as “man’s inability to make use of his understanding without direction from another” (Dupre, 2004).
Kant
maintained that this tutelage was self-inflicted since its primary
cause was not found in man’s lack of ability or reason but rather in
man’s lack of determination and courage to use his own reason without
any direction or persuasion from another. “Sapere aude! Have courage to use your own reason!” – That is the motto of Enlightenment as articulated by Kant (Dupre, 2004).
The Enlightenment Project was not a uniform socio-political
movement with a core set of ideological socio-political beliefs and
strict applications. On the contrary, it can be defined as a cluster of
thoughts and beliefs which although at times were radically different
they did share in common a conscious attempt to define, explain and
control the human predicament and existence in a rational way aided by
the use of scientific knowledge and technology (Berlin, 1956).
Rationalism was born in 6th century BC in Greece. It was heavily
influenced by early Greek philosophers such as Thales, Anaximander,
Parmenides, Socrates, Aristotle and Plato. Greeks taught themselves to
reason. Aristotle articulated the notion that “knowledge should be understood as the internal abstraction of the external and objective structure of the world”. The Socratic dictum “the unexamined life is not worth living”
is premised on his belief that a person needs to critically think (to
rationalise) about ethical propositions. In Plato’s allegory of the
cave, Plato maintains that it takes rational introspection to escape the
cave and understand the world. Without reason people will continue to
believe in the shadows they have spent their whole life looking at.
The Enlightenment Period
Although there is no historical consensus on the beginning of the
Enlightenment period it’s roots can most probably be traced to the end
of the Thirty Year war and the Peace of Westphalia in 1648 which
resulted in the restructuring of a new European continent and the
progressive and systematic attempt to withdraw all religious claims and
antipathies from the political and public spheres of society. This
period witnessed a breakthrough and development of modern science
culminating in the establishment of modern scientific methods. In doing
so, it helped create the “historical and social scientific inquiries that enable us to speak with such confidence about the social dependency of the self” (Baker & Reil, 2001).
Freedom and morality
The Enlightenment Project introduced a new age of freedom and
progress terminating centuries of darkness, theocracy and superstition
through the promotion and encouragement a more tolerant, moral and
acceptable society. The use of reason and rationalist etiology was
considered an essential path to progress and to man’s ultimate objective
being none other than the pursuit of human perfection and freedom
(Booth & Smith 1995). To be truly free, man had to free himself from
ignorance and from the prevailing medieval superstitions and
indoctrinations which were articulated by various institutions, such at
the Church and the prevailing aristocracy, with the intent of shaping
and controlling man’s destiny and identity at birth (Booth & Smith,
1995). The Enlightenment Project opposed these constraints bringing them
under intense scrutiny and criticism (Booth & Smith, 1995).
The attainment of ‘true freedom’ was a cornerstone belief shared in
common by rationalist thinkers during the Enlightenment period. Baruch
Spinoza, one of the great rationalists of the 17th century, maintained
the view that it is man’s rationality that enables him to classify
objects and information presented to him in accordance to and through
his own experience (Phemister, 2006). Spinoza further maintained the
view that man can only form true universal notions and understandings
and begin to think rationally about objects and information presented to
him if he becomes an “active seeker of knowledge” rather than a passive
recipient of knowledge and information presented to him by third
parties without stringently evaluating their content (Phemister, 2006).
Greek Enlightenment and the Greek Revolution of 1821
Under Ottoman yoke for many centuries the average Greek polity was
not exposed to the current of enlightenment thought emanating from the
Western Europe. Nonetheless, the Greek Revolution in 1821 was a product
of such Enlightenment. Wealthy Greek merchants and educated Diaspora
Greeks were exposed to the ideas of the Enlightenment and the French
Revolution. The publications of various writings by, visionary pioneers
of Greek enlightenment, Rigas Ferraios (Ρήγας Φεραίος) and Adamantios
Korais (Αδαμάντιος Κοραής) played a pivotal role in developing Greek
national consciousness and instilling a desire for democracy and human
rights.
Rigas Ferraios wrote his Anthology of Physics in 1790 (Φυσικής απάνθισμα) with the desire to offer young Greek students the scientific knowledge of the French Encyclopédie by Diderot. Moreover in his battle hymn Thourios (Θούρειος) he called upon the Greek people to revolt writing, “It’s finer to live one hour as a free man than forty years as a slave and prisoner” («Ως πότε παλικάρια να ζούμε στα στενά…. Καλύτερα μίας ώρας ελεύθερη ζωή παρά σαράντα χρόνια σκλαβιά και φυλακή»).
The Need for a Greek Neo-Enlightenment
More than 185 years since the attainment of liberty Greeks remain
“enslaved”. Enslaved to ignorance and prevailing indoctrinations which
for many decades have been articulated by various socio-political
institutions with the intent of shaping and controlling the Greek
people’s destiny.
To become truly free, Greek citizens must become active seekers of
knowledge. We must release ourselves from our self-incurred tutelage. We
must challenge the existing premise that Greek citizens are helpless,
weak, flawed and incompetent. We need to step back, objectify and reach a
detached and individuated intellectual vantage point, where reason can
be given free reign. Progress, freedom and knowledge must be achieved at
all times and the only way to do so is through the use of rational
thought, science and innovation.
The need for a Greek Neo-Enlightenment is today more than ever necessary.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια :
Δημοσίευση σχολίου