Forget Grexit. Brexit is Europe’s Latest Threat
|
But EU-skeptics weren’t satisfied. Then over the weekend, one of the most powerful politicians in Great Britain, London Mayor Boris Johnson, said he wanted out of the EU. A decisive referendum now looms on June 23, one that will determine whether Britain pulls out of the 28-country Union or not.
|
The concern is that the British economy will suffer if trade and other economic links with the EU get severed. London could also lose prominence as a financial capital, with jobs and power migrating to other cities in continental Europe over time.
The bigger issue for investors (outside of those looking to profit from moves in the British pound) is that the Brexit crisis is just the latest in a long series of them emanating from Europe. The PIIGS debt crisis. The migrant influx crisis. The European banking sector crisis.
They keep on coming — and European politicians are having a tougher and tougher time coming up with solutions. That tells me Europe is fraying at the edges, a longer-term problem for the European economy and European shares.
“Continue to avoid the large European banks … and keep an eye on this Brexit threat.” |
If polling over the next few months suggests the “Leave the EU” campaign is gaining steam, it will likely lead to more market turmoil at a time when stocks are dealing with plenty of it already.
How about you? Do you think Brexit risk is a big problem for stocks? Or are other factors more important? Will the collapsing pound encourage you to book a flight to London? Or is it not on your radar screen? What about the other European crises — are you worried about what impact they’ll have here in the States? Let me hear about it online.
|
Reader Bob shared his take on the Amazon.com (AMZN) issue, saying: “I believe a large part it is Amazon. Plus, consumers have been spending money on home improvements, new furniture, and new homes.
“We own a small retail store and many of our top customers in 2014 hardly spent any money in 2015. We still had a good relationship with them and they all were doing what I mentioned above, so their money was going away from clothing and fashion. I also see UPS and FedEx drivers on a daily basis and they tell me their fellow drivers who service residential say it is amazing how many more home deliveries they are making versus several years ago.”
Reader Brian said the biggest problem is paychecks, plain and simple. His comments: “Until the living wage goes up, I’m unsure who the retailers think will buy their products. Real income hasn’t gone up since the ’70s. Almost all expansion since then has been based on credit. There’s only so much credit to go around unless cash starts flying out of helicopters.”
Reader Johan also picked up on that train of thought, saying: “First, labor participation is low, while unemployment is 5%. So it’s 5% of a smaller universe, meaning less income to spend at retail. Second, the population is aging and the ‘echo boom’ is paying down college debt, not buying homes, appliances, and baby clothes like the Boomers did.
“We need more good jobs and people in them to fuel growth. But I don’t see that happening soon.”
Reader David S. pushed back against the idea that Wal-Mart Stores’ (WMT) problems begin and end with Amazon. He said: “I shop at Wal-Mart on a regular basis and what I see being bought there (food, clothing, household supplies of all sorts, car supplies, sports equipment, etc.) by the low-income masses is not what would ordinarily be bought on Amazon. So it’s not obvious to me that there’s that much competition between the two.
“It also seems to me that the prices aren’t much different. And of course, there’s no wait for delivery at Wal-Mart, and they have an on-line purchase option if anyone craves it. In my area (San Francisco Bay), rents have increased dramatically and that might have a greater effect on in-store retail sales than it does for on-line retail.”
Thanks for taking some time out to comment. If I didn’t get to your views, or if you want to add anything further, be sure to use the discussion section below as your outlet.
|
The research group just released a report estimating that SWFs will have to sell more than $404 billion worth of shares this year if oil prices remain mired in the $30 to $40 range. That would be almost twice the estimated $213 billion they yanked from global stock markets in 2015.
If you lived in Japan, would you stack your cash in a safe rather than earn next to nothing at a bank? What do you think of the ongoing selling wave from sovereign wealth funds? How about the election results? Any thoughts on how they might impact the markets? Let me hear about it in the comment section below.
Until next time,
Mike Larson
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια :
Δημοσίευση σχολίου